During lawsuit trials,
litigants weaponised documents by rewriting the past in a way that legitimised
the writer’s (or the person who commissioned the document to be written for
them) property claim in the present and to prevent the case being reopened in
the future. The authors of charters, also known as charter draftsmen, gave a
lot of consideration to how they would portray the series of events surrounding
the property dispute. Charters, therefore, became crucial legal instruments
during the tenth century; they were highly crafted and tailored for each
individual case, forming a key strategy in the pursuit of victory.
Certain charters functioned
as statements to be submitted to the court and read aloud to the presiding
judges (known as the witan in Old English, meaning ‘wise men’) as part of
ongoing legal proceedings. Some charter draftsmen, like the creators of ‘the
Crimes of Wulfbald’ narrative, incorporated accounts of crimes that had led to
the forfeiture of a noble man or woman’s land into later charters. These
charters granted the seized lands to loyal followers of the crown or local
elite and served as a way of protecting the new owner against claims arising
from the individuals involved in the earlier stages of the history of the
estate.
Today, we would consider
court documents to be non-biased and an objective record of the facts
surrounding a case. However, early medieval charters can be treated as literary
texts, as well as historical and legal texts, due to the creativity involved in
constructing the narrative. This requires historians to take an
inter-disciplinary approach when conducting their analysis of charters.